Who Selects Elders?
A question I received: Tell me what you think about this statement: “Elders appointing an additional elder or more, without discussion with or consulting the congregation, is dictatorial and shows little if any respect for or trust in the church as a whole.”
First, there should be a selection before the appointment.
I used to think they were the same. A congregation would select and appoint elders. I thought they were the same. Selection is a process that precedes appointment.
When the apostles received the complaint in Acts 6:1, they resolved to select and appoint “seven men of good reputation, full of the Holy Spirit and wisdom.”
Notice the process. The apostles said to the multitude:
- You (multitude) select — 30.102 ἐπισκέπτομαιa: to choose or select on the basis of having investigated carefully—‘to select carefully, to choose after careful investigation.’ ἐπισκέψασθε δέ, ἀδελφοί, ἄνδρας ἐξ ὑμῶν μαρτυρουμένους ἑπτὰ πλήρεις πνεύματος ‘so then, fellow believers, carefully select seven men among you who are known to be full of the Holy Spirit’ Ac 6:3 (Louw, J. P., & Nida, E. A. (1996). In Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament: based on semantic domains (electronic ed. of the 2nd edition., Vol. 1, p. 362). United Bible Societies).
- We will appoint — 37.104 καθίστημιa; καθίζωd: to assign to someone a position of authority over others—‘to put in charge of, to appoint, to designate’ (Louw, J. P., & Nida, E. A. (1996). In Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament: based on semantic domains (electronic ed. of the 2nd edition., Vol. 1, p. 483). United Bible Societies).
They gave the qualities of the men. The multitude was to look among the thousands of men, select seven, and bring them to the apostles, who would appoint them.
- The group selected.
- The apostles appointed.
But why didn’t the apostles select them? Jesus selected and appointed them, taught them, and trained them.
That’s an exciting thought. But the apostles whom Jesus selected, appointed, and trained said:
- You (the group, multitude) select.
- We appoint.
Why Do Elders and Congregations Not Do That?
Answer: I don’t know unless they tell me. 1 Corinthians 2:11
I don’t know what you’re thinking unless you tell me. You don’t know what I’m thinking unless I tell you.
First thought: they did what they did because they thought it was the best thing to do. Proverbs 21:2
Second observation: they did what they did because that’s how they’ve always seen it done. The first time I heard of a church letting the congregation select the elders, I thought they were liberal and didn’t respect the authority of elders. Further study showed me this was how to select leaders in the Old and New Testaments. Acts 6:1-7; Deuteronomy 1:1-18
Another thought: elders fear the church may appoint someone(s) they can’t work with. If that means a man is unreasonable, uneducated, undisciplined, and a demonstrated poor leader (as observed in how he relates to his family), one or more elders can personally object during the vetting stage of the appointment. These things are covered in 1 Timothy and Titus.
If it means the new elder(s) may want to shepherd and oversee in a different way, that may be the best thing to happen to the church. There are churches where elders have been senior deacons micromanaging what the deacons were doing. A change would improve the leadership. There are churches where the elders see the building is in good shape and the bills are paid but rarely or never take time to minister to the spiritual needs of members or plan for the future of the church. A change would be a breath of fresh air to benefit the present eldership and the church.
I heard an eldership say, “If you turn those people loose, there’s no telling who they’ll come up with.” This was stated by an eldership that was the charter eldership for the congregation. The congregation had selected them. If there’s a fear of a lack of knowledge and wisdom in the congregation when choosing leaders, that could reflect their lack of teaching and leadership. Why does the church not have the information and understanding to read the Bible and apply it to a process in the ongoing life of a congregation?
More posts on the selection of elders:
Who Selects Leaders in the Church?
Who Selects Leaders in the Church? #2
Obviously, good brother, you and I have walked a lot of the same roads. Good stuff!
I believe God left many things to us to decide. There are qualifications listed. But there really is no formal process outlined. We can piece together a process. But God knows us and understood there would be more than one way to go about this, too. What works well for some may not be best for others. Obviously, he intended there to be multiple perspectives “in the room” or he would have just had us appoint a “pastor” or CEO type who makes all the decisions. The meshing of those personalities is truly a challenge since none of us have identical backgrounds or perspectives. Beyond the 1 Timothy qualifications, we try to find someone who can work well, not agree always, with the other elders. But until you’re actually in discussion, you can’t truly know how well that will work. There have been numerous men fully qualified according to scripture who simply would not accept. Others who seem to be qualified but have other qualities that would keep the current elders from being willing to appoint. Just like everything else, this is imperfect.
Jerrie,
I agree that the selection and appointing processes are separate and should involve the entire congregation. As in Acts 6, the Apostles supervised the entire process to make sure that the “select from among you” task done by the brethren would pass the “full of the Spirit and of wisdom” gate before the Apostles “put [the special servants] in charge of this task” and the Apostles further “laid their hands on them.” Clearly there are multiple processes performed by different groups of people. Although this involves Apostles [none are alive today] and a measure of the Holy Spirit that ceased in the first century AD, I believe the example in Acts 6 is valuable and healthy for today’s selection and appointment of elders and deacons. I would go further and suggest that bringing on a located preacher should have the same seriousness attached to it, i.e., allow the congregation to have a voice, well supervised by the elders or in the case of no elders, the faithful brethren charged to Timothy (2 Tim 2:2).
In conclusion, I agree with the sentiment of the person who kicked off your discussion: “Elders appointing an additional elder or more, without discussion with or consulting the congregation, is dictatorial and shows little if any respect for or trust in the church as a whole”. I would emphasize that to ignore the congregation during this process places the incoming elders in a deep hole where trust, the currency of leadership, has been destroyed. Trust, as you know, is hard to secure and easy to destroy.
One final note – DO NOT RACE TO APPOINT ELDERS. The qualifications in 1 Timothy 3, Titus 1, and 1 Peter 5 require serious evaluation, prayer, interviews, prayer, study, discussion, and finally prayer. The elders selected must be blameless and go through a healthy and respectful process by brethren who have specks (sometimes logs) in their own eyes (Luke 6:41).
P.S. I like your comments regarding “Why Do Elders and Congregations Not Do That?”
If you don’t have Doug’s book, Seting in Order the Things That Are Wanting, I recommend you get it for you and your elders. It is the most comprehensive book I’ve read on the eldership: https://sainpublications.com/product/set-in-order-the-things-that-are-lacking/